Chapitre 3

 Le Confucianisme・儒教（じゅきょう）

1 Les grandes lignes du Confucianisme

Le Confucianisme a beaucoup inspiré le Japon et la Corée notamment. Il y a des économistes qui parlent de « pays confucianistes ».

1.1 La vie de Confucius (孔子, こうし)

Né en 551 ou 552 avant Jésus Christ dans le pays de Lu, en Chine. Il a eu une enfance difficile dans une famille peu aisée, et perd son père très jeune. A l'âge de 15 ans, il décide de s'établir grâce aux études, pour devenir un haut fonctionnaire. Il était brillant et ambitieux. Jusqu'à l'âge de 30 ans, il continue ses études tout en débutant sa carrière en gérant un grand domaine agricole.

A l'âge de 36 ans, il trouve une mission pour un pays voisin, le pays Zhou, et revient à l'âge de 43 ans. A son retour, on se presse dans sa demeure pour lui demande conseil, et c'est comme ça qu'il se crée un cercle de disciples. Son but était d'intégrer le gouvernement, mais les autorités l'ignorent : Confucius se replie chez lui.

A l'âge 52 ans, il réussit enfin ! Il est nommé gouverneur de la ville de Zhongdu, puis devient assistant du ministre des Travaux publics, et enfin à l'âge 54 ans devient Ministre de la Justice, puis Conseiller du gouvernement. Au sein du gouvernement, il lance un projet de réforme, mais c'est un échec : il démissionne et quitte le pays. Pour cet épisode, il existe plusieurs versions : certains disent que son projet n'a pas échoué mais qu'il a été forcé de partir. Pendant 14 ans il erre dans les pays voisins en cherchant à se faire embaucher, toujours dans la politique.

A l'âge de 69 ans, il revient dans son pays natal : « Dès lors, il a compris : son exigence morale ne s'accordera jamais à la réalité politique du temps. Son royaume n'est pas de ce monde corrompu ; il renonce à briguer une quelconque charge. Il consacra son énergie à définir les notions qui lui tiennent à cœur et à les enseigner » (Confucius - Des mots en action, C. ELISSEEFF, Collection Découvertes Gallimard, 2003). Il se consacre à l'enseignement et devient le « Maître de 3000 disciples ». Il meurt à l'âge de 74 ans, en 479 avant Jésus Christ.

1.2 Et un siècle plus tard...

Confucius est divinisé, et son enseignement devient la religion officielle de l'Empire de Han en 136 avant Jésus Christ.

1.3 Le Confucianisme est-il une religion ?

Pour les Japonais, ça n'a jamais été une religion.

1.4 Les principaux textes

• « Les entretiens » (論語, ろんご) : recueil des paroles du Maître, écrits par ses disciples. Vers 100 avant Jésus Christ. C'est le texte de référence en matière de Confucianisme pour les Japonais. En Chine il y a eu un développement théorique plus important.

• Et “四書五経, ししょ・ごきょう” : 5 ouvrages dits « édités par Confucius » sur la poésie, l'histoire, les pensées etc + 4 recueils de paroles des maîtres édités par les disciples.

Au Japon, c'est avant tout Rongo qui est considéré comme texte de référence.

Arrivé vers le début du 16e siècle, Rongo a été imposé aux samurai comme éthique de référence sous le Bakufu d'Edo → rôle souvent comparé à celui de la Bible (nouveau testament) dans la culture occidentale.

1.5 L'arrivée du Confucianisme au Japon et son développement

• 405 : une délégation coréenne apporte 11 textes Confucéens.

• 6e siècle : la Cour impériale invite les théoriciens Confucéens de Chine.

  → Influences dans « la Constitution en 17 articles » du Prince Shôtoku.

• Époque d'Edo : le Bakufu adopte le Confucianisme comme principes idéologiques et moraux des samurai : le respect, la fidélité, la loyauté, la modestie etc. Les citadins Japonais de l'époque d'Edo étaient assez cultivés, le niveau d'alphabétisation était élevé.

• Après Meiji : la culture des samurai se répand largement dans la société ; forte influence au plan moral sur toute la société.

1.6 Autres pays influencés par le Confucianisme

→ La Chine, la Corée et le Vietnam (colonisé par la Chine pendant 1000 ans à partir de 111 avant Jésus Christ). Les Vietnamiens ont ces notions de Confucianisme et culturellement parlant ils se comprennent bien avec les Japonais.

~

« L2 S3 Civilisation Japonaise - Chapitre 3.pdf »

Chapitre II

Dynamique des rivalités

Exemple

On parle beaucoup de la mondialisation : il y a une interprétation de la mondialisation comme une situation qui est là, et à laquelle il faut s'adapter. Mais la mondialisation est le résultat de stratégies, de décisions, ce n'est donc pas un état forcément permanent.

1 Un environnement contraignant

La dynamique est perçue par rapport aux différentes structures de marché. On a des structures de marché : concurrence, oligopole, monopole, duopole. Le problème qui est posé est d'essayer de délimiter les caractéristiques de telles ou telles situations qui vont conduire à telle structure de marché. Selon la structure du marché, cette structure est sensée définir (de manière contraignante) les comportements des acteurs. Les comportements qui doivent être rationnels définissent aussi les performances. La question qui se pose est de savoir qu'est-ce qui peut conduire à avoir telle structure de marché ? Quels sont les paramètres qui peuvent influencer les critères de définitions de ces structures de marché ? Ces même caractéristiques peuvent être aussi liées au fait que des stratégies modifient ces paramètres ou essaye de les contrôler : les comportements (stratégies) des entreprises vont créer des situations, et donc dans ce cadre là les structures ne sont pas le produit d'un environnement contraignant mais le produit de ces stratégies.

Quelles sont les caractéristiques qui peuvent avoir une influence sur le nombre d'offreurs ?

Plus le nombre d'offreur est grand, plus la situation est concurrentielle, et plus le nombre d'offreur est petit plus la situation tendra à être une oligopole ou un monopole.

→ Caractéristiques des processus de production : il faut combiner des ressources. Ces ressources sont plus ou moins rares. Si elles sont rares, ça limite le nombre d'offre, si elles sont abondantes cela permet d'avoir beaucoup d'offreurs. Est-ce que cette rareté est incontrôlée, ou fabriquée délibérément ? Parmi les ressources, on a des matières premières dont on ne peut pas totalement contrôler la rareté mais tout de même l'influencer (on peut tenter d'en faire un monopole, par exemple il y eu une entreprise qui a essayé de racheter toutes les mines d'argent, ou une autre qui a tenté de contrôler toute l'électricité de la Californie). Ressources humaines : on a besoin de main-d’œuvre, en quantité ou en qualité. La croissance française a eu besoin de main-d’œuvre étrangère depuis 200 ans. Ressources techniques (machines).

→ Caractéristiques du produit : durabilité ou transportabilité peuvent avoir une incidence. Si on est dans la situation d'un bien durable, il est stockable ; et inversement.

→ Caractéristiques réglementaires : cela peut conduire à limiter strictement le nombre d'offreurs, et faciliter ou rendre plus difficile l'implémentation d'offreurs. On produit tant de médecins par an et pas plus, par exemple, toujours dans l'optique de créer la rareté. Demande de la part des entreprises d'une réglementation qui leur serait favorable. Il y a aussi les Brevets et les droits de propriété intellectuelle.

[…]

Élasticité-prix. Variation de ventes % la variation de prix/période.

Notion de saturation

On parle de saturation lorsque presque 100% d'une population donnée détient le bien en question. Dans cette situation augmenter sa clientèle devient difficile, les producteurs espèrent des renouvellements.

Le cycle de vie d'un produit

Décrit l'évolution des ventes d'un bien donné au cours du temps. Il peut y avoir une variation du nombre de consommateurs / de la demande.

2 Un environnement changeant, espace de jeux stratégiques

2.1 La rivalité des concurrents directs

2.2 La menace des nouveaux entrants

a Des barrières liées aux coûts de production

b Des barrières hors coûts

2.3 La pression des substituts

2.4 Le pouvoir de négociation des fournisseurs et des clients

~

« L2 S3 Eco.Gestion Chapitre II.pdf »

American Civilization

TD

6 periods :

• Colonial

• War of Independence

• Expansion

• Civil War - 1860-1870

• The Gilded Age - 1877-1917

• WWI / Great Depression

Colonial

• Christopher Columbus, 1492.

• The British wanted to bring as much gold as the Spanish did, but when they got to Virginia there was no gold. They had to find another way to make money: and that was tobacco.

1607: Jamestown: plantation of tobacco. The population who created Jamestown was undesirable in England (people from the street, the poor, who went to jell,...). Half the colony died of starvation. Captain John Smith said they need to work, of they wouldn't eat (Marshall law?).

• 1620: The Massachusetts Bay Company. There is a money aspect, it's a company. But especially a religious aspect: Pilgrims, Puritans (religious, Protestants/Calvinists), religious fanatics at the time. Puritans idea were the bases of the future American Ideology. They left England for religious freedom for themselves, they were persecuted by the Anglican church and the Catholics. They started by going to Holland because there were other Puritans there, but they left Holland too because they were so extreme in their belief that even other Calvinists in Holland were too liberal for them. So they went to America, part of England as an English Colony, which mean they had the permission of the King, who wanted to get rid of these troublemakers. The fact that they were extremely radical, created a devastating clash with the Indian communities. (There is a link with the Jews (about the Old Testament), they think being the chosen ones.) The Indian represented the Devil for them, as they were so wild. Before the Puritans came, a disease cleared the area by killing a lot of Indians, so the Puritans saw a sign that God did that for them. For the Spanish or the French it was different, they didn't mind co-living with the Indians.

In the Indian mind, you can't own a land, it's God's Nature. So when they said to the Whites they could take the lands, they didn't realized that the Whites meant to have it forever as their own, so when the Indians came back to hunt or something, the Whites thought they were breaking the deal. With such a difference, Whites and Indians couldn't live together. The Puritans even dehumanized the Indians, but some of them wanted to convert them to Christianity. In the 1640s, there was a Civil War in England between the King and Puritans. So during the Colonization period, from 1620 to 1690 (for Massachusetts), there was a war back in England, and they felt guilty about their brother fighting for their religion, but fighting the Indians or trying to convert them made them feel less guilty.

Mayflower = name of the boat the Puritans came with. The Puritans were supposed to go to Jamestown. But because of a storm, they landed not in Virginia but in Massachusetts : where they was no royal representative. There weren't only puritans on the boat, more than half weren't. So as there wasn't any structure, they decided to create their own Government, so they were going to elect one person to lead them, for the good of the colony.

For the Indians at the time, there was already Democracy. They chose their own Chief.

Maps

(each thick line is a new expansion)

Starting by: Virginia = “the thirteen colonies” by the English.

1783, after the Revolutionary war, the colons gain the second line of expansion: the United States started.

1803, the expansion keeps going to Louisiana that they purchased from France.

1818, North Dakota ceded by Great Britain.

1819, Spanish Cession (of Florida), progressively from 1810, 1813 and finally 1819.

1845, Texas Annexation.

1846, Oregon Country ceded by Great Britain.

1848, Mexican Cession.

1853, Gadsden purchase (South Arizona & New Mexico).

1867, Alaska taken from Russia.

Text of the Mayflower compact, 1620

Only men signed, only men counted, considering themselves the chosen people of God. Anne Hutchinson was a puritan woman who started interpreting the Bible, so she was banned as the men felt insulted by a woman like that. The Puritans was really Patriarchal.

Christianity = based on the Bible, belief on the Christ.

Catholicism (Catholic church)

Anglican church     |
Church of England | Reformation
Protestantism        | (Martin Luther)

The Church of England and the Anglican Church (same thing) separated from Catholicism.

The Puritans came from Protestantism, they are the most extreme, thought the Church of England was too much alike with the Catholic church. So they are called Separatists. They're also called Pilgrims (pèlerin - religious/spiritual quest), meaning that they're on the spiritual journey. They want to build a “city on a hill” because they're the pure people, and this city has to shine to save humanity. They chased what were “witch” or “devils” for them.

→ Salem came from Jerusalem.

J.Hector St.John de Crevecoeur, Letters from an American farmer (1792)

Letter 3 : “What Is An American ?”

He's the author : these letters are “persona” (he's inventing the characters), in order of showing his ideas → it's called Epistolary fiction (myth in a sense).

His main purpose is to define American identity. It's crucial at this time because it's the birth of the nation, it needs an identity.

Ideas:

• Described as a sort of Utopia. Returning to this idea of “pure age” before society waste it, the Golden Age. Arcadia → bucolic paradise. Very patriotic text, he's talking about America as a perfect Society. The puritans saw themselves as a beacon illuminating the world, and here the author seems to join this idea except it's not religious but economic and religious (l.156).

• A new race of men: melting pot. The “races” excluded are the slaves, Indians, blacks,... Only the whites, the melting pot is just one made of European: French, Dutch, Spanish, German, English,... But even if the Indians are taken off of the pictures, there's quite a big mention of Indians: most of them negative, but at the end some positives. For the Europeans, the Indians and the Blacks are not considered human so they could feel better about what they did to them, “it's not a big deal 'cause they're not even humans”.

• L.23: he's opposing before and after (wild and woody to cultures, houses, roads).

  L.50: “we're a people of cultivators” → it's not about businessmen but farmers. The proximity to the land is very important. There is so much lands, so much abundance, it's inexhaustible: that's why America is so special, everything had been exhausted in Europe, not in America. Farmers are the most important image here.

• Europeans are described as “plants” that couldn't “grow” anymore, evolve, so they are “unrooted” and “transplanted” to America, and the America will turn them into better “plants” The problem is that if the land is so rejuvenating, how can we say that the Indians are barbarians? The place where they've lived is the place where we think it's rejuvenating. The ideal American is going to be the Quaker farmer, because the Quaker had been able to keep its noble European self (the science of ancient societies), but also been able to come back to the simplicity of nature through farming. They intends to tame (= domesticate something that's wild) the wildness to farms, communities. They rid of the “artifice”, the bad part of Europe. The opposite of the Quaker are the hunters (they're not working hard in the fields, so they have time for sins). Indians were cultivators (corn, beans,...) but for the Ideology they left that out.

• At the end of his book, Crevecoeur is actually going to change his mind: how could the Europeans could chose to live with the Indians, the the Indians never wanted to join the Europeans? There is something wrong here, there is contradictions with the ideology.

The main idea is that human characters (personality) and human institutions (democracy, religion, economic institutions, social institutions, government...) are the product of the environmental where they find themselves. The American land is amazing, and once they would have learn to transform it, they would be exceptional, different from Europeans (“American Exceptional ism”). Nature is playing a role here (so the tricky part is about the Indians).

The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

* One of the purpose is to give justification for separation – list of grievances against the King.

* The recipient (destinataire) is the World, it's addressed to “mankind”, requires power → France is one of these powers. Submitted to a “candid world”.

* “Laws of Nature & Nature's God”: the Kind has been devastated of authority → attack on the divine right of Kings. Protestant Reformation: 1517 Martin Luther. Spiritual independence: they don't need a Pope or anything to be connected to God. Newton in 1686 wrote Principia, in which he wrote his discoveries : Humans have reason because they understand the laws of God threw the laws of Nature. It's the reason why they can decide for themselves and do not depend on the King anymore, there is a deification of Nature. 1689 Locke wrote Treatise on Government to justify the Glorious Revolution of 1688, when the King lost his authority in England and Parliament is in power, birth of Constitutional Monarchy. Locke wrote about “natural rights philosophy”, man is part of a natural world order. Compact theory: the duty of Government is to insure that individuals […]. Human Reason (from Nature, Newton's idea) is going to be the only law. Link between God, Nature and Reason. They couldn't attack the Democratic institution of the Constitutional Monarchy, so they attack the King.

* Did everybody in the colonies want to separate from England? Only 30% of the population in the colonies agreed with the rebellion. 30% were against it, and around 30% undecided. Maybe rebels with the Declaration are trying to bring undecided people to them.

Two sides :

Federalists: Hamilton, Washington. → Want a strong central government. Afraid of Democracy, Hamilton sounded like a dictator, he's afraid that the poor take the power over.

Anti-federalists: Jefferson → Weak central government and strong state government. They were the most Democratic. They're in favor of agriculture, and local government.

It's going to take a long time for those two to work out an agreement.

George Washington, extract from Farewell Address, 1796

Federalist text wrote by Hamilton. There are different ideologies at this time :

• Democratic Republicans (Jeffersonian) developed in the 1790s

  → There is a link between the Democratic Republicans and the Anti-Federalists.

  → They want agrarian economy; weak central government ; power to the states + individuals; close ties with France; no central bank

• Federalists (Hamiltonian) developed in the 1780s

  → Washington is part of this, even if he can be considered independent.

  → These guys want the opposite. Strong central government; national bank; industry / commerce; weaker state government; close ties to Britain
  
  

* In the world during the 1790s:

• Britain and France are at war → obvious problem of unity for the US whom some want close ties to France and other to Britain.

  → Factionalism /!\ (opposing ideology in political factions).

  → The speech is a foreboding of the civil war in coming.

Federalists = North East.

Democratic Republicans = Rural areas: South & West.

* Isolationism: not getting involved in Europe conflicts. The US want a commercial relationship with Europe without any political aspect implied, but it's not going to be something which could work forever.

In this last part (4^th paragraph) he's basically saying “we're a young republic, we can't afford to go against a major Empire”.

The idea of no being politically involved: where is it going? When commercial interest clash, conflict begins. → The War of 1812 against England. The British burnt down Washington during that war.

Contradictions in the American history

• 1776-1781: Articles of Confederation in 81 = first attempt to Constitution

• 1786-87: Shay’s Rebellion (big battle in Massachusetts because they need money and imposing taxes on farmers – the people who are crying freedom are repressing the poor that's a contradiction) → During the Constitutional Convention (adopted in 87) → battle in the states for ratification.

• 1791: The Bill of Rights, to protect individual freedom.

• 1794: The Whiskey Rebellion (too much taxes on everything in the production of whiskey)

• 1796: Washington - Farewell Address

• 1798: Alien + Sedition Act → Basically sedition means rebellion. It becomes illegal to speak against the government and the President, which is a contradiction towards the Bill of Rights (freedom of speech).

Presidents :

• Washington (Federalist / Independent) 1789 – 1797

• Adams (also a Federalist) 1797- 1801

• Jefferson (finally a anti-Federalist) 1801 – 1809

President Monroe's 7^th annual message to Congress, December 2, 1823 (extracts)

The North West = The Oregon territory.

This territory is wanted by Russia, Great Britain, and the Americans, attracted by the Fur trade. The Americans also want an access to the ocean by the river. This will last until 1845.

States becoming independents

1821 revolutions – Mexico (declared his independence from Spain), Colombia

1823 revolutions – Peru, Brazil

Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico and California were part of Mexico before the 1821 revolution. Only Texas remains afterward.

→ Texas has a special history: Texas was a state of Mexico, 1825-1835

American came in Texas: Houston, Texas, was founded by Sam Houston. Austin, Texas, founded by Stephen Austin. But Americans who lived here had conditions: speak Spanish, no slaves, loyalty to Mexico, becoming Catholics,... So people rebelled and proclaimed Texas as an independent state. There has been a war, and Texas became “the lone star Republic”. This was the case until 1845.

Florida

Problems with run-away slaves: there are slaves in Georgia, who escape from Georgia to Florida because it's Mexican, there are no slaves there.

The war of 1812

US vs GB, GB loses the war. Secretary of state (Foreign affairs) in American administration was John Quincy Adams (he wrote the text). He was not in a friendly disposition with GB, he ended the war without treating GB with special conditions. When he talks about “the continent” he talks about North & South America (the US, the North-West territory, South America, central America, from Mexico to Chile, Caribbean islands), excluding Canada (which was a British Colony at the time).

The question of Freedom

This is a problematic question: it means different things. Ulterior motive.

1823: Monroe Doctrine: sets the precedent for US relations with its Southern neighbors → “southern brethren (= brother in a spiritual sense)”.

1901: Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine: for Theodore Roosevelt, “not only we want Europe to stay out, but we're planning to go in” (open imperialist policy, all the way through Wilson. Ex: Haiti, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Colombia,...).

1933: Good neighbor policy: “If you owe us money and won't pay back we're going to take it with the Navy and control you”

Continuity between Monroe and Roosevelt → two president's doctrines defining the foreign policy of America.

Events in Europe:

Spain & Portugal → Problems with consequences of Napoleon's reign.

The Monroe doctrine

Basically telling to Western power (England, Spain, France,...) to stay out of Latin America. United States has a right to control Mexico, the Caribbean, Cuba, South America,... US considered that this is their sphere of influence, Europe should stay out of it.

Abraham Lincoln, Letter to Horace Greely, 1862; Abraham Lincoln, Address delivered at the dedication of the cemetery at Gettysburg, PA, Nov. 19, 1863

He wants to restore the union.

Slavery issue:

• There is myths around Lincoln who free the slaves. But he wasn't an abolitionist. He wanted to keep slaves for economic reasons.

• Two different economic theories:

  Slave labor: Democrats

  VS free wage labor: New Republicans = democracy capitalism, see slavery as a type of Feudalism, backward economic theory → opposite of slavery

→ It was economic interest which led the South to keep slavery, or they wouldn't have money to win the war.

→ Lincoln only frees slaves in the states fighting against the Union in order not to anger the people fighting on his side who were slave owners too, but he knew that after the was slavery would disappear.

→ Lincoln explains that there is war to re-unify the states. Slavery ended at the end of the war in 1865, with the 13^th Amendment.

1860 election of Lincoln.

Republican plank (set of policies, promises from the politicians).

American Territory and Ideology

• American Interests, 1897

* 1860-1890 (the closing of the frontier, basically last Indian wars)

→ Economic (industrial/agricultural) output. United States is producing so much that they need to extend and find other markets to dump some of its production.

→ All the big nations were powerful thanks to their navy → they think to do the same.

→ 1888 – The Berlin Conference (the Meeting of the Thieves, European powers dividing Africa among themselves).

• The Anglo-Saxon mission, 1885 / American redemption of the world, 1900 / American world empire, 1902

* Charles Darwin, 1840s: evolution, animals who can adapt themselves in environment will be the ones who survive.

→ Herbert Spencer → Social Darwinism, apply on:

• Humans: Survival of the fittest (= strongest, healthiest)

• Institutions: Christianity, Democracy, Capitalism

• Societies: Human societies are going to be characterized by hierarchy

  → Northern European superiority → Anglo-Saxon: all of the Northern European races and German and Great Britain. Ideology of superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race over all of the other people).

  → Catch phrase about White men superiority: “The White Men's Burden” from The Jungle Book, R. Kipling. → Meaning that it's the burden (= fardeau) of the Whites to teach inferior/ignorant people their values (Christianity).

Andrew Carnegie, Wealth, American Review, No. CCCXCI, JUNE, 1889

Robber Barons, extremely wealthy at the time, “The Gilded Age”:

• Carnegie – Steel

• Rockefeller – Oil

• J.P. Morgan – Banking

→ Economic inequality is good. If you're rich you're naturally selected to be the fittest. Government cannot take your money and give it to someone who's poor.

If government can't help the poor, how are they going to survive? → Philanthropy (“Gospel of Wealth”, it is the duty of the rich men to give/donate/contribute some of his wealth for his community by opening schools, libraries, museums, art galleries,...), which is not the role of Government but of individual wealthy men. These people were establishing foundations, which are still active today, this is part of the American system.

1901-1917: Progressivism, reform movements (social workers, political leaders,...) opposed to the Social Darwinism.

Gilded = Illusion.

TO KNOW

* Causes for the Civil War

* Reconstruction (67-77) (military occupation in the South by the Northern army) → why does it end? Dispute in 77 about the president election.

* Post-war legislation:

• Civil Rights Act 1865

• Free Reconstruction Amendments 13, 14, 15

Woodrow Wilson, War Message to Congress, 2 April, 1917 (extracts); George Norris, speech before the Senate, April 4, 1917; U.S. 65^th Congress

* Bush actually used this “War message” about the Irak war.

* Financial interests (economic) to the war:

• weapons' dealers

• newspapers

• banks
  
  

* Everything is linked: American history isn't just things which happen individually.

• 1880s → 1900s: SD / New Imperialism, Spanish / American War 1898

• 1880s = The Gilded Age (Robber Barons, creation of trusts) → denunciation of extreme wealth → extreme poverty → social unrest (rebellions, strikes, unions, labor movement, anti-capitalist parties like socialists, anarchists, communists) : very present at the beginning of the 20^th century.

• Because of this social unrest → 1901-1919 → The Progressive Movement – reform movement (T. Roosevelt). When a country goes to war, it's also because there is domestic problems. We don't talk about it but it's there.

• Dollar Diplomacy, covering this period:

  T. Roosevelt → Rep → 1904

  Taft → Rep → 1908

  Wilson → Dem → 1912

  Wilson → Dem → 1914 – Peace Candidate (“we're not going to get involved in the war”)

  → The American government is going to insure its domination (on Nicaragua, Mexico, Haiti,...).

  For example : In Nicaragua is was a dictatorship, and the dictator Sandino wanted to free its country from the American domination, so Wilson, the « peace candidate », sens him its marines.

• 1917 (big date to remember): Russian Revolution →

  The poorest / Bolsheviks (communists) against the aristocracy / the Tzar Nicolas.

  Wilson feared that the same situation begin in the US. So Wilson send weapons to the Tzar to help fighting the revolution → anti-democratic movement.

• 1917-1918: anti-war movement, linked to anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist. Coalition of forces: it's not just anti-war but also linked to ideologies.

  → Espionage Act → 1917 → If you interfere with the draft (=conscription into the army) (means anti-war actions) → $10 000 fine / 20 years imprisonment.

  → Sedition Act → 1918 → If you speak out against the US government or the flag → jail.

* Wilson in history is a problematic figure. Between what he said (pro-democratic) and what he did, there is a huge gap: First Red Scare (1919) → intense repression of the left, socialist, workers (IWW, International Workers of the World, important union), anti-capitalist. People say that's why there is no left party in the US today → Wilson destroyed it.

* The Charles Schenck Affair, linked to Wilson. Charles Scheck was arrested under the Espionage Act → He was anti-war, so he was arrested and found guilty, he was even taken to Supreme Court: will the Supreme Court will condemn Freedom of Speech? Oliver Wendel Holmes said that we can't protect free speech every time: if you're at a movie theater and you stand and start speaking loud, that's free speech, but should you be protected? He decided that it was a clear and present danger, so Schenck was to be condemned.

Our American System, Speech by President Hoover – October 22, 1928

The 1920s:

* Superficial wealth, false sense of security. At the end there was going to be a Depression.

* There is no Democrat until 1931, the Republican party dominates. Hoover was a Republican.

* Economic freedom, economic success of rugged individualism.

* For Hoover, everyone is responsible of his own success or failure.

* Social security = retirement pension, it isn't link to health care.

* The populist movement = populism. Farmers and labor movement.

→ desire for change, for reforms.

→ The 1920s are a business decade. The businessmen and the factories are the center of the American life: beginning of consumerism. But wages don't increase and so there is less and less consumers. Overproduction in the agricultural and industrial sector would be one of the cause of the Great Depression.

* There was a farming crisis in the 1920s, people went to town to find a job.

“The Only thing we have to fear” Franklin D. Roosevelt's First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933

The public is the American population. With this speech he's trying to “cheer up” the people, giving a new breathe → restoring hope. The speech is looking at encourage people not to despair, have faith,... It's needed in this period of crisis, which has started two years ago: the situation was drastic. So Roosevelt is trying to infuse courage.

25% of unemployment. As a solution for unemployment he talked about Public Work programs (building). Financial problem: banks are another issue he has to deal with. The Banking system collapsed in the early months of 1933 because people took all their money out, they didn't trust the system anymore. To Roosevelt, “there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments” → he's going to create acts like the Emergency Banking act, which will pass in one day (usually it can takes months on even years before an act pass, which show the emergency of the situation). But that doesn't solve the problem of people taking their money out of the banks, for that he closed the banks two days after his speech (if you close the banks you can't withdraw your money). That gave him time to come up with a solution.

Agricultural problem: the prices are low, there is a surplus of agricultural commodities (corn, wheat, cotton,...); farmers can't make a living. To fix this problem he's going to attempt three things:

• Destroy/burn crops, which is drastic and contradictory as people are starving, it's the crisis.

• There is a lot of pigs, so he kills a lot of baby pigs.

• As the latter solutions aren't going to be successful, he's going to pay farmers not to plant.

Why would a farmer find himself in a city looking for work ? Because he lost his farm, the bank took it → a lot of farmers aren't owner of their farms, they borrowed money: they put their farms on mortgage so if they can't reimburse the bank will take their farms.

He acknowledges that trade is important, in paragraph 14. But they need to address the immediate problems, then they look at trade. The first New Deal: the 3 Rs → Relief (from your suffering), Recovery (Economic), Reform. This looks at people, economy and politics (capitalism).

Another major area: Industry. National Industrial Recovery Act.

The Bill of Rights: text and key words

What would have happened if the Bill of Rights hasn't been accepted ? The Constitution would not have been notified.

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments, which represent protection for individual civil rights (especially the first 8 actually). Today there is 27 amendments.

Problematic amendments

First Amendment

Congress cannot advocate a religion. But in Court, we swear on the Bible. There is a contradiction that was not contested, it's cultural.

Freedom of Speech: “I can say or write whatever I want”, but there is laws like the Sedition Act. Unacceptable free speech: anti-war speech → if the speech puts the population in danger, so it is not protected under the First amendment. On the press they couldn't publish anti-federalist articles.

Second Amendment

At the time (in 1791) it was necessary, there was a general atmosphere of insecurity, there was not enough money to pay the soldiers. As the government couldn't protect the people against any kind of threat, they should be allowed to bear their own arms. There were many militias (Minute Men), who gave themselves the rights to bear arms and use them to defend their “cause”. There were catastrophic events from lunatics, with massive weapons, which ended up in massacres. Example: David Karesh (Waco, Texas), who owned a property and thought he was Jesus Christ: he was overly armed, and his people (the Davidians) wanted to defend their liberties and properties: Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms. He refuses to give up and stood off for a few days when the government surrounded his property. It ended up with the property taking fire. During the Civil Arms movement there were a lot of group (like the Black Panthers) who claimed it was their rights. The all problem with this is also that arms isn't defined.

Eighth Amendment

The Death Penalty is an issue. People trying to outlaw that penalty. It was abolished in several states but not because of the Eighth Amendment, but because Blacks had twice as much chances to be sentenced to death as Whites.

Common law

If you have two same crimes in the same circumstances, both sentences should be the same.

~

« L2 S3 TD Civilisation Américaine.pdf »